-
RACKS TO CANOFPUSS!
Well said my good man!
I too agree, even though some here would disagree, that militant gay bashing is wrong. I've said in the past, that I don't hate the homo, I hate the homo's chosen lifestyle! And I don't have to close my eyes to the fact that homosexual activities are an abomination, and should be treated as such! Which means, not allowing to cock gobbling faggots to adopt an innocent child!
There are tens of thousands of husbands and wives, who aren't able to have children. Who would give their left foot for a chance to adopt some of these orphans! The problem being, it's too fucking difficult to do so, without going to hell and back. Most end up adopting overseas!
Thanks to all the social workers, and lawyers looking to pad their pockets. Some of these kids will never have a chance at a normal life! Especially now that Timmy and Tommy (life partners) are able to adopt.
------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
-
http://www.hostboard.com/forums/
RICKETY RACKITY RACK CANIBUS!!!!!!
My beef (no jokes, please) with homosexuals is borne in their immoral, self-indulgant lifestyle. They do NOT care about the betterment of society, they do NOT care about morality, etc. etc. etc.
Those who are appologists for homosexuals are, themselves, taking the position that none of us are responsible or accountable to society- that none of us should take steps and measures to ensure that we or those around us are having a positive effect on society.
This is all about morality and respect. Fags have neither.
------------------
inaacpkyfag - (n) 1. the art of kicking one's own ass 2. the act of knowing you're a worthless piece of shit 3. slang a board bitch
[This message has been edited by Jimmy Medalions (edited February 05, 2002).]
-
But Jimmers, Abe Lincoln was a "pole-smoker," and while we might not agree with his various politics, it's absurd to discount his devotion to public service--or, to suggest that his service was devoted to a homosexual agenda.
Similarly, the genius of Leonardo Da Vinci was essentially dedicated to humanity, as was the art of Michelangelo--both ardent "pole-smokers."
As for Greece and Roman being "fallen" civilizations, this is absurd. Just look at the architecture of our civic buildings and city designs, the structure of our government and its essential principles of democracy and rationale as the basis for civil life. And the legal code to enforce it all. Did you think this was all biblically inspired? Are you clueless as to Jefferson's primary influences? What, after all, do you suppose was being revived in the "renaissance," if not the thinking, values, and MIND of the Greeks and Romans?
"Et tu, faggot?" That's what you'd say to Julius Caesar? If you had one chance to address him--having been brought before him as a curious speciman of the day's hostages. "E' tu, faggot?" you'd blurt at the stocky 5'8" balding (voracious) bisexual whose steely blue eyes look right through you. His translator translates this and the steely eyes narrow--and turn away to deal with a hundred different weighty matters. You are remanded to trench-digging slave work and forgotten entirely. (Rozy, you'd be remanded to the camp brothel, of course, where they'd get a big kick out of your fountain-like laughter)
------------------
[This message has been edited by Friend Of Ours (edited February 05, 2002).]
-
Here's how I look at things:
Is it better to tolerate or to hate?
I say tolerance is preferable. Hatred is a negative emotion, and should be reserved for individuals and acts that directly have a significantly negative impact on one's life. To spend it on unknown people doing private consentual acts is to misplace it.
Is it better that everyone do everything the same, or is variety and diversity preferred?
I contend that diversity is better. I can't say how, but somehow in ways that I am unable to comprehend, the world is probably better off with homosexuals than it would be without them. But we'll never know.
Should everything be knowable, or is life more interesting if some things forever remain mysteries?
I think life would be somewhat more dull if we were able to know everything. The question of why homosexuality exists may never be known, and that's OK.
To the extent that it's considered getting punked on this board if one melts down or otherwise gets overly emotional as a result of what's posted, it can be said that the queers are getting over on the haytahs if the same principle is applied to real life. They're out doing what they wanna do, knowing that it pisses certain individuals off, and there ain't a damn thing they can do about it. SCOREBOARD fruits!!
Bottom line: Why waste emotional energy on something over which you have absolutely no chance of ever having control?
------------------
Hey pal...you just blow in from Stupidtown?
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
"Et tu, faggot?" That's what you'd say to Julius Caesar? If you had one chance to address him--having been brought before him as a curious speciman of the day's hostages. "E' tu, faggot?" you'd blurt at the stocky 5'8" balding (voracious) bisexual whose steely blue eyes look right through you. His translator translates this and the steely eyes narrow--and turn away to deal with a hundred different weighty matters. You are remanded to trench-digging slave work and forgotten entirely. (Rozy, you'd be remanded to the camp brothel, of course, where they'd get a big kick out of your fountain-like laughter)
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Errrrrrrr - wasn't that an R&J reset? Oh - it WAS funny as shit, too.
------------------
<A HREF="http://160.79.129.225/waves/10110/fart3112.wav" TARGET=_blank>Click on this for what I really think of you!
</A>
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jimmy Medalions:
God is apparently down with murder, rape and other self-absorbed pursuits. He intended for us to kill one another huh?
[/B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
God intended humans to have free will. She knew that there would be some who would abuse this freedom.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jimmy Medalions:
I have one gay friend, who is in the 2% minority of gays who avoid that which I find disgusting about gays. Drugs, STDs, disrespect for values, etc. Even he is repulsed by the shit he sees on a daily basis (no pun intended ) You're off-track.
[/B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You have just admitted that there is a distinction between gays and these disgusting things. Why do you assume that to be gay means that these choices are automatic?
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jimmy Medalions:
You'd be guessing wrong. Had He not given a hamster's ass, he wouldn't have first created a penis, with all of it's appointments, and THEN created the vagina, along with its appointments. They are functionally co-dependent.
[/B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
She also created your right hand, co-dependant. By your rationale creation could have stopped right there http://www.hostboard.com/forums/
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jimmy Medalions:
I don't think He worries either. In the end, He'll drop-kick deserving nimrod's asses accordingly. The goal is to be a self-governing society, I think that's what He'd have hoped for. Gays don't bring that to the table.
[/B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Free will. You're right Jimmah. Why aren't gays a part of that.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jimmy Medalions:
If you look at the background of gays, you'll note strife and family issues from an early age. Or you'll note manipulation by others. In any event, it is a choice in my mind. Further, whether by choice or by birth, homosexuality is not a license to carry on in a manner that is diametrically-opposed to soceity's interests. Drugs, diseases, and promiscuity to that degree were never okay by society, or God himself.
[/B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Strife and family issues are prevalent in straight and gay indivduals, and it can lead to fucked up people. This is not a cause of sexual preferance.
I believe God is more disgusted than all of us by drugs, diseases and promiscuity. This is not condoned by God, however these are choices. I believe sexualitiy is not a choice for most individuals.
If, as you claim, your gay friend does not fit your gay profile, why do you turn around and state that homosexuals have no interest in bettering society. Do you believe in blanket statements about any other demographic groups?
There are good straights and bad ones. Good gays and bad ones. Good people and bad ones. God offers the possibility for forgiveness to all.
------------------
Yeah, you're one of them.
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Ruff Dogg:
So the purpose of every sexual act should be procreation and every act that is incapable of this is wrong??!!
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's not what dude meant. Yes, sex is meant to procreate, but sex is also a gift from God as a way for a married man and woman to show love to each other physically.
------------------
you can always pound it through the uprights... if you're using a Norm Johnson.
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Ruff Dogg:
So the purpose of every sexual act should be procreation and every act that is incapable of this is wrong??!!
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
------------------
Just call me the Great Dane
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Ruff Dogg:
So the purpose of every sexual act should be procreation and every act that is incapable of this is wrong??!!
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's not what he said, you stupid moron.
YES, sex is for procreation. But it's also a gift from God as a way for a MARRIED man and woman to display love for each other.
End of story.
NO EXCUSES
------------------
I oughtta bop ya son, I oughtta bop ya
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Puff Doggiestyledbyaman:
El, you claim that homos are learned. Just when was it that you "learned" your sexuality? Let me guess, you'll come back with "homosexuality is learned and heterosexuality is innate" right? Well, maybe you do like to have it both ways. http://www.hostboard.com/forums/
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
PeterPuff Dogg,
I was brought up in a NORMAL household. Which means I had a mom and a dad! Now who's to say, what would have happened if I had been raised by two mansauce connoisseur? Elgrande being the strong independent type, would have no doubt still turned out a healthy heterosexual. Even with the evil forces associated with having homosexual parents. But like we all know, not everyone is strong willed. And some sucum to pier pressure! Meaning they'd follow in their homosexual parents footsteps (which would no doubt be a trail of manseed)!
The point being. Homosexual households destroy the very fabric of family. The moral aspect of that lifestyle is repugnant, no matter which way you slice it!
And yes heterosexuality is innate! When you're born with a penis, you're ultimately meant to fertilize an egg to reproduce LIFE! Which guarantees our existence. When you're born with a vagina, you're ultimately responsibility is to cultivate [B]LIFE[b] via your reproductive organs! Which also guarantees the human existence.
HOMOSEXUALS learn their sick behavior, from other HOMOSEXUALS!!!!! If homosexuality was never introduced into their lives, and only heterosexuality thrust upon them. You can bet your sweet little manseed loving ass that 100% of the population would be HETEROSEXUAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And another thing. If homosexuality is innate, as you and Smackie claim it to be! THEN WHY, IN THE NAME OF GUY FAWKES TONGUING ANOTHER MAN, CAN'T TWO MALES HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE REPRODUCE????? OR TWO FEMALES FOR THAT MATTER????? I mean really, if homosexuality was innate as you claim, we'd all be asexual. We'd have no sex organs, or we'd have a combination of the two. Allowing each sex to reproduce!
But as reality would have it, we don't! I realize some of you don't like to life in reality, or deal in facts. Which is where your misguided ideas come from. But the fact of the matter is that HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR is abnormal!!!!!
------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
